Why you should care about rural development in California

As the Golden State’s economy recovers from the Great Recession, the region is once again experiencing economic growth.

But it’s been slower this time around, and while many economists predict the area could be a hub for a new wave of development, a new study suggests the region could become a regional economic center.

The findings from a study published Thursday by the University of California-Davis Center for Regional Research are based on more than 40 years of data.

The study, titled “A new reality: rural development is a regional growth story,” looks at how growth has been occurring across California and how that is affecting areas that are currently experiencing low-density growth.

The study was released by the university and the Economic Development Council, an industry group that promotes economic development in the state.

It analyzed economic data from the U.S. Census Bureau and found that over the past decade, the county population has grown by about a million people.

But the growth has slowed significantly in the past five years, which is when the economy has been contracting.

For example, in 2016, the number of residents living in Fresno County grew by 2.4 million.

But that growth slowed to 0.8 million in 2017.

In 2018, the population of Fresno County shrunk by 2 million.

In 2019, the city of Fresno grew by 3.3 million, but it dropped to just under 1 million in 2020.

In 2021, the same situation played out, with Fresno’s population dropping by 1.2 million.

In 2022, Fresno County’s population grew by 1 million, and then dropped to 1.3 in the following year.

In the coming decades, the research predicts that Fresno County will be a regional center for new growth.

It’s not just Fresno, though, as the study also found that the growth will be more pronounced in the Central Valley, a region that is experiencing the most rapid population growth.

In fact, Fresno has been the fastest-growing region in California in recent years.

But the study doesn’t have a solution to the issue of population growth, as it is dependent on the ability of cities to attract and retain workers.

It also doesn’t address whether cities are able to create jobs and grow as well as the region’s existing residents.

The authors say it’s important for cities to look at their own priorities and find ways to create a diverse and dynamic economy.

They recommend focusing on creating an environment that is safe and livable for everyone, including those who are new to the area.

The report is just the latest in a series of research findings from the university, which has long studied the region.

The first report, released in 2005, found that Fresno is the most populous county in the U, but that it was the second most economically diverse county.

The second study, released last year, also found Fresno was the most diverse county in California, but in terms of its population, the authors found it was in a more diverse state than most of the states.

The third report, published in 2010, found Fresno County had the highest percentage of white residents of any county in America, but also that Fresno’s overall unemployment rate was the highest of any U.N. country.

The fourth study, published last year by the UC Davis Center for Urban Studies, also showed Fresno County is home to some of the lowest concentrations of minorities of any American county, but the study found the county’s population growth rate was also lower than most other areas of the country.

Overall, the report found that more than half of the counties in California were in the middle of the pack in terms in terms to population and unemployment, but those rankings were not necessarily indicative of a healthy economy.

For example, some counties in the Northern California Central Valley that had high unemployment rates were not among the most economically healthy, and that’s not necessarily a good thing.