The latest evidence from the OECD, released in September, is a stunning indictment of America’s “rural transformation.”
This was a key theme in a 2010 Brookings Institution report on how to fix our rural economy.
We need to take a fresh look at how rural development has evolved in the past 30 years, the report concluded, noting that rural development was a major driver of inequality and social injustice.
But the report also made clear that the United States was not the only country to experience the transformation.
The OECD data shows that many countries in Europe, Africa and Latin America have done even better than the United Kingdom.
But while the United State has made some important changes, it has made a huge mistake, as the OECD found.
Its rural transformation policies have left us vulnerable to social and economic inequity.
The United States has a history of marginalizing rural development as a priority in urban policymaking.
Its “rampant poverty” is a well-known fact.
Its emphasis on building schools, roads and highways has led to massive infrastructure investments in the US.
But these policies have led to a significant decline in rural areas.
The rise of suburbs, as a result of the suburbanization of the suburbs and a loss of land, have been especially damaging to rural economies, the OECD study found.
The report said that in rural communities, more than half the children in urban schools are not in schools, and half the adults in urban areas are unemployed or working in the agricultural sector.
The US also has a long history of denying the importance of rural communities in economic development.
It has made significant investments in roads and railways, but they have often been poorly constructed and poorly monitored.
The failure of these infrastructure projects to provide rural communities with access to jobs has led some rural communities to become the most disadvantaged groups in America.
“The United States’ failure to create a robust rural development agenda is a direct consequence of the United